<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poltergeist?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forgetomori.com/2007/paranormal/ghosts/poltergeist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forgetomori.com/2007/paranormal/ghosts/poltergeist/</link>
	<description>Extraordinary claims. Ordinary investigations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:03:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2007/paranormal/ghosts/poltergeist/comment-page-1/#comment-5488</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 08:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2007/paranormal/ghosts/poltergeist/#comment-5488</guid>
		<description>how does it prove levitation? Ever heard of a thrown object?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how does it prove levitation? Ever heard of a thrown object?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Boyce</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2007/paranormal/ghosts/poltergeist/comment-page-1/#comment-4627</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Boyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2007/paranormal/ghosts/poltergeist/#comment-4627</guid>
		<description>In the Enfield photo I would guess quite a fast film with short exposure was used since there is hardly any motion blur. However, I do think a slight blur is noticeable in the girl&#039;s right hand.

It does seem amazing that the investigators could accept such photographs as proof of levitation.

It&#039;s unfortunate (or maybe that should be &quot;fortunate&quot;, for some involved?) that, when trying to capture moving footage, the camera broke down. (Don&#039;t you just hate it when that happens?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Enfield photo I would guess quite a fast film with short exposure was used since there is hardly any motion blur. However, I do think a slight blur is noticeable in the girl&#8217;s right hand.</p>
<p>It does seem amazing that the investigators could accept such photographs as proof of levitation.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s unfortunate (or maybe that should be &#8220;fortunate&#8221;, for some involved?) that, when trying to capture moving footage, the camera broke down. (Don&#8217;t you just hate it when that happens?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: njnj</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2007/paranormal/ghosts/poltergeist/comment-page-1/#comment-3637</link>
		<dc:creator>njnj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2007/paranormal/ghosts/poltergeist/#comment-3637</guid>
		<description>omg was that real!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omg was that real!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samnouny</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2007/paranormal/ghosts/poltergeist/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Samnouny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2007/paranormal/ghosts/poltergeist/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>The bottom one was taken before he hit the bean bag after a jump. on the top you can see on te bed where the force of her jumping ruffled the sheet in the oppisite direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bottom one was taken before he hit the bean bag after a jump. on the top you can see on te bed where the force of her jumping ruffled the sheet in the oppisite direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

