<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kumburgaz, Turkey UFO video reproduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/kumburgaz-turkey-ufo-video-reproduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/kumburgaz-turkey-ufo-video-reproduction/</link>
	<description>Extraordinary claims. Ordinary investigations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 05:49:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: UFO Istanbul / Kumburgaz Turkey (2008) Analyse &#171; Enigmes TV</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/kumburgaz-turkey-ufo-video-reproduction/comment-page-1/#comment-5957</link>
		<dc:creator>UFO Istanbul / Kumburgaz Turkey (2008) Analyse &#171; Enigmes TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 16:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/kumburgaz-turkey-ufo-video-reproduction/#comment-5957</guid>
		<description>[...] Le dernier passage de cette vidéo, quand l&#8217;objet change de formes, est tout simplement explicable comme ceci ; http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-ph &#8230; roduction/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Le dernier passage de cette vidéo, quand l&#8217;objet change de formes, est tout simplement explicable comme ceci ; <a href="http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-ph" rel="nofollow">http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-ph</a> &#8230; roduction/ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason lee</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/kumburgaz-turkey-ufo-video-reproduction/comment-page-1/#comment-5885</link>
		<dc:creator>jason lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 23:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/kumburgaz-turkey-ufo-video-reproduction/#comment-5885</guid>
		<description>very good job for a three minute made thing. it is a joke that anyone believes the original. for the following reasons.

he makes out we can see aliens and the ship is moving in the sky. but a few things are missing that even a good hoax has. 
if he is tracking it we see no trees or houses or anything to referance it to whatsoever so maybe by chance he is nowhere near trees or houses right? if you have been somewhere near no houses trees or streets its usually really dark which means you get to see lots and lots of stars. but not one in this video?

ok still not convinced im right? then think really carefully and use logic on the next bit i type and come up with a way im wrong ready....

the camera being used has really sucky anti shake if any. generally the more expensive the camera the more features correct? with me so far. here is the kicker...

i live up a big hill. if i buy a £6000 camcorder it comes with two things standard. 14x optical and very good anti shake

so unless he has a camera worth tons more and choose to carry the really expensive camera instead of taking a tripod and intentionally switch off the anti shake then whats going on? it gets better though
at 14x optical i wouldnt be able to get as much detail as this just pointing at a car at the bottom of my hill. when he zooms out its a dot right so must be really far away otherwise would still look viewable with no zoom correct so if its far away my question is what optical zoom camera is it? 3000 optical? even strong binoculars at x50 would have problems and most video cameras dont even go that high. 

so use logic and tell me how that works. 
my theory adds up.
cheap video camera 5x optical rubbish anti shake. small item on a hill surface board whatever. zoom out very small zoom in loads of detail. all the people that did not work that out or lack of stars and referance points you are not that bright for insulting the video. 
a 3min setup? imagine how good it would look if he took his time to actually make a hoax

you are all really really gullible.
yes there are probably aliens out there
but the turkey video sucks bad. 

ps the doctor who was meant to have filmed some of this is really really into aliens. knows about videos and such. dont you think a guy that really really wants to prove they exist would choose not to zoom out and show referance points when he would know full well it would remove all doubt whatsoever zoom out oh look there is a house and the horizon and trees and above all of that is a ufo. but no he knew it but didnt do it.
stinks of fake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good job for a three minute made thing. it is a joke that anyone believes the original. for the following reasons.</p>
<p>he makes out we can see aliens and the ship is moving in the sky. but a few things are missing that even a good hoax has.<br />
if he is tracking it we see no trees or houses or anything to referance it to whatsoever so maybe by chance he is nowhere near trees or houses right? if you have been somewhere near no houses trees or streets its usually really dark which means you get to see lots and lots of stars. but not one in this video?</p>
<p>ok still not convinced im right? then think really carefully and use logic on the next bit i type and come up with a way im wrong ready&#8230;.</p>
<p>the camera being used has really sucky anti shake if any. generally the more expensive the camera the more features correct? with me so far. here is the kicker&#8230;</p>
<p>i live up a big hill. if i buy a £6000 camcorder it comes with two things standard. 14x optical and very good anti shake</p>
<p>so unless he has a camera worth tons more and choose to carry the really expensive camera instead of taking a tripod and intentionally switch off the anti shake then whats going on? it gets better though<br />
at 14x optical i wouldnt be able to get as much detail as this just pointing at a car at the bottom of my hill. when he zooms out its a dot right so must be really far away otherwise would still look viewable with no zoom correct so if its far away my question is what optical zoom camera is it? 3000 optical? even strong binoculars at x50 would have problems and most video cameras dont even go that high. </p>
<p>so use logic and tell me how that works.<br />
my theory adds up.<br />
cheap video camera 5x optical rubbish anti shake. small item on a hill surface board whatever. zoom out very small zoom in loads of detail. all the people that did not work that out or lack of stars and referance points you are not that bright for insulting the video.<br />
a 3min setup? imagine how good it would look if he took his time to actually make a hoax</p>
<p>you are all really really gullible.<br />
yes there are probably aliens out there<br />
but the turkey video sucks bad. </p>
<p>ps the doctor who was meant to have filmed some of this is really really into aliens. knows about videos and such. dont you think a guy that really really wants to prove they exist would choose not to zoom out and show referance points when he would know full well it would remove all doubt whatsoever zoom out oh look there is a house and the horizon and trees and above all of that is a ufo. but no he knew it but didnt do it.<br />
stinks of fake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Kumburgaz, Turkey UFO video reproduction &#124; forgetomori -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/kumburgaz-turkey-ufo-video-reproduction/comment-page-1/#comment-4578</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Kumburgaz, Turkey UFO video reproduction &#124; forgetomori -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 03:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/kumburgaz-turkey-ufo-video-reproduction/#comment-4578</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by neuronafm, Andrés Guineo Águila. Andrés Guineo Águila said: @neuronafm acá está el link de la &#039;explicación&#039; de Kentano Mori a uno de los videos de Kumburgaz. http://bit.ly/9WBZoE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by neuronafm, Andrés Guineo Águila. Andrés Guineo Águila said: @neuronafm acá está el link de la &#39;explicación&#39; de Kentano Mori a uno de los videos de Kumburgaz. <a href="http://bit.ly/9WBZoE" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9WBZoE</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Los ovnis de Kumburgaz son ventanas de lanchas &#171; El Tachiportal Paranormal</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/kumburgaz-turkey-ufo-video-reproduction/comment-page-1/#comment-4530</link>
		<dc:creator>Los ovnis de Kumburgaz son ventanas de lanchas &#171; El Tachiportal Paranormal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 23:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/kumburgaz-turkey-ufo-video-reproduction/#comment-4530</guid>
		<description>[...] en su momento Kentaro Mori, desarrolla su propia teoría sobre lo que pueden ser estos objetos y recrea en video lo que pueden ser estos [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] en su momento Kentaro Mori, desarrolla su propia teoría sobre lo que pueden ser estos objetos y recrea en video lo que pueden ser estos [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Los ovnis de Kumburgaz son ventanas de lanchas &#124; El TachiBlog</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/kumburgaz-turkey-ufo-video-reproduction/comment-page-1/#comment-4529</link>
		<dc:creator>Los ovnis de Kumburgaz son ventanas de lanchas &#124; El TachiBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 23:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/kumburgaz-turkey-ufo-video-reproduction/#comment-4529</guid>
		<description>[...] en su momento Kentaro Mori, desarrolla su propia teoría sobre lo que pueden ser estos objetos y recrea en video lo que pueden ser estos [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] en su momento Kentaro Mori, desarrolla su propia teoría sobre lo que pueden ser estos objetos y recrea en video lo que pueden ser estos [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

