<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Shiny Saucers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/more-shiny-saucers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/more-shiny-saucers/</link>
	<description>Extraordinary claims. Ordinary investigations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 05:49:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marko</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/more-shiny-saucers/comment-page-1/#comment-2299</link>
		<dc:creator>Marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/more-shiny-saucers/#comment-2299</guid>
		<description>The object doesn&#039;t look static at all.
Looking at the parallax changes, the object is moving against the sky background, there&#039;s an independent and not linear movement. Frankly speaking I think this is pretty obvious and saying it&#039;s a static model, it&#039;s a pretty rough conclusion.

Strings?
I&#039;m working in the film industry in visual effects and before computer I used to work with miniature photography, it&#039;s very hard to achieve a smooth movement like this (just don&#039;t look at the camera shakings), using strings, without a complex rig that sometimes requires computer motion controlled devices mounted on rails. If you&#039;re thinking about a plastic miniature hanging from a fishing rod, well I&#039;m afraid this is not the case!
I&#039;m not saying this one couldn&#039;t be a hoax at all, but these footages (there are more than one) are the most impressive I&#039;ve ever, ever seen in years. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The object doesn&#8217;t look static at all.<br />
Looking at the parallax changes, the object is moving against the sky background, there&#8217;s an independent and not linear movement. Frankly speaking I think this is pretty obvious and saying it&#8217;s a static model, it&#8217;s a pretty rough conclusion.</p>
<p>Strings?<br />
I&#8217;m working in the film industry in visual effects and before computer I used to work with miniature photography, it&#8217;s very hard to achieve a smooth movement like this (just don&#8217;t look at the camera shakings), using strings, without a complex rig that sometimes requires computer motion controlled devices mounted on rails. If you&#8217;re thinking about a plastic miniature hanging from a fishing rod, well I&#8217;m afraid this is not the case!<br />
I&#8217;m not saying this one couldn&#8217;t be a hoax at all, but these footages (there are more than one) are the most impressive I&#8217;ve ever, ever seen in years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/more-shiny-saucers/comment-page-1/#comment-1334</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2008/ufos/ufo-photos/more-shiny-saucers/#comment-1334</guid>
		<description>the saucer does look like it&#039;s moving in relation to the clouds...

also, notice how the image becomes unstable after it zooms in on the object, due to the camera being handheld...

this does not mean it was not faked though. it would have been nice to see other objects in the video, to give the viewer a sense of perspective</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the saucer does look like it&#8217;s moving in relation to the clouds&#8230;</p>
<p>also, notice how the image becomes unstable after it zooms in on the object, due to the camera being handheld&#8230;</p>
<p>this does not mean it was not faked though. it would have been nice to see other objects in the video, to give the viewer a sense of perspective</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

