Comments on: More Shiny Saucers

By: Sergey

Sergey — Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:08:31 +0000

Regarding of Paul Villa’s photo – I don’t know if Villa claimed that this disc was big, but in description of his contact you can read:

“…nine remotely-controlled monitoring disks which were 14 inches in diameter, and were controlled from instrument panels in the Mothership.” (http://home.earthlink.net/~dexxxaa/_wsn/page2.html)

14 inches it’s 35.56 centimeters.

From this point of view this photo really shows small object and it is not a hoax.

By: Marko

Marko — Wed, 20 May 2009 12:08:07 +0000

The object doesn’t look static at all.
Looking at the parallax changes, the object is moving against the sky background, there’s an independent and not linear movement. Frankly speaking I think this is pretty obvious and saying it’s a static model, it’s a pretty rough conclusion.

Strings?
I’m working in the film industry in visual effects and before computer I used to work with miniature photography, it’s very hard to achieve a smooth movement like this (just don’t look at the camera shakings), using strings, without a complex rig that sometimes requires computer motion controlled devices mounted on rails. If you’re thinking about a plastic miniature hanging from a fishing rod, well I’m afraid this is not the case!
I’m not saying this one couldn’t be a hoax at all, but these footages (there are more than one) are the most impressive I’ve ever, ever seen in years.

By: chris

chris — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:44:21 +0000

the saucer does look like it’s moving in relation to the clouds…

also, notice how the image becomes unstable after it zooms in on the object, due to the camera being handheld…

this does not mean it was not faked though. it would have been nice to see other objects in the video, to give the viewer a sense of perspective