<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A suspicious UFO in Wichita</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forgetomori.com/2009/ufos/ufo-photos/a-suspicious-ufo-in-wichita/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forgetomori.com/2009/ufos/ufo-photos/a-suspicious-ufo-in-wichita/</link>
	<description>Extraordinary claims. Ordinary investigations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 05:49:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lol</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2009/ufos/ufo-photos/a-suspicious-ufo-in-wichita/comment-page-1/#comment-6016</link>
		<dc:creator>lol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 19:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2009/ufos/ufo-photos/a-suspicious-ufo-in-wichita/#comment-6016</guid>
		<description>out-focused bird</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>out-focused bird</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCG</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2009/ufos/ufo-photos/a-suspicious-ufo-in-wichita/comment-page-1/#comment-1984</link>
		<dc:creator>MCG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2009/ufos/ufo-photos/a-suspicious-ufo-in-wichita/#comment-1984</guid>
		<description>I think it could be a UH-1 Huey ex-military helicopter. There are plenty in civilian ownership, and no reason why one couldn&#039;t be painted in black. Also, helicopters can seem amazingly fast at low altitude - which this one seems to be at.

This forum post has a couple of images showing the photo in comparison with a UH-1: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.poe-news.com/forums/sp.php?si=&amp;fi=000079889&amp;ti=1001944769&amp;pi=1001944801&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it could be a UH-1 Huey ex-military helicopter. There are plenty in civilian ownership, and no reason why one couldn&#8217;t be painted in black. Also, helicopters can seem amazingly fast at low altitude &#8211; which this one seems to be at.</p>
<p>This forum post has a couple of images showing the photo in comparison with a UH-1: <a href="http://www.poe-news.com/forums/sp.php?si=&amp;fi=000079889&amp;ti=1001944769&amp;pi=1001944801" rel="nofollow">link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCG</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2009/ufos/ufo-photos/a-suspicious-ufo-in-wichita/comment-page-1/#comment-1970</link>
		<dc:creator>MCG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2009/ufos/ufo-photos/a-suspicious-ufo-in-wichita/#comment-1970</guid>
		<description>It looks like a poorly focused photo of a Bell UH-1 Huey military helicopter. Excuse the photos, but the resemblance seems patently obvious:



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like a poorly focused photo of a Bell UH-1 Huey military helicopter. Excuse the photos, but the resemblance seems patently obvious:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les liens du dimanche #12 &#124; ufofu</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2009/ufos/ufo-photos/a-suspicious-ufo-in-wichita/comment-page-1/#comment-1969</link>
		<dc:creator>Les liens du dimanche #12 &#124; ufofu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2009/ufos/ufo-photos/a-suspicious-ufo-in-wichita/#comment-1969</guid>
		<description>[...] B2 transportant un drone similaire au SR-71 ? NON ! Un putain d&#8217;oiseau, encore [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] B2 transportant un drone similaire au SR-71 ? NON ! Un putain d&#8217;oiseau, encore [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig York</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2009/ufos/ufo-photos/a-suspicious-ufo-in-wichita/comment-page-1/#comment-1963</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2009/ufos/ufo-photos/a-suspicious-ufo-in-wichita/#comment-1963</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what it is, but like you, I seriously doubt 
its anything remarkable. It &lt;em&gt;doesn&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; look much like the images I&#039;ve seen of the B-2, and the notion its totting a
drone of some kind around on its back is a little silly. The
D-21 drone mentioned indirectly in the link wasn&#039;t a stunning
success-rather the opposite-and nothing I&#039;ve seen in recent
aviation literature suggests that anybody is trying the formula again. The lack of motion blur mentioned in the link is fairly telling as well. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what it is, but like you, I seriously doubt<br />
its anything remarkable. It <em>doesn&#8217;t</em> look much like the images I&#8217;ve seen of the B-2, and the notion its totting a<br />
drone of some kind around on its back is a little silly. The<br />
D-21 drone mentioned indirectly in the link wasn&#8217;t a stunning<br />
success-rather the opposite-and nothing I&#8217;ve seen in recent<br />
aviation literature suggests that anybody is trying the formula again. The lack of motion blur mentioned in the link is fairly telling as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

