<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Battle of Paris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forgetomori.com/2010/ufos/ufo-photos/the-battle-of-paris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forgetomori.com/2010/ufos/ufo-photos/the-battle-of-paris/</link>
	<description>Extraordinary claims. Ordinary investigations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 05:49:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2010/ufos/ufo-photos/the-battle-of-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-4252</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2010/ufos/ufo-photos/the-battle-of-paris/#comment-4252</guid>
		<description>He may have also been influenced by Stereo in Montreal. The original club had a massive mirror ball that flooded the room with light.  He is from Montreal and was there when the first Stereo was open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He may have also been influenced by Stereo in Montreal. The original club had a massive mirror ball that flooded the room with light.  He is from Montreal and was there when the first Stereo was open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fighting the Phantom Menace at the Battle of Los Angeles &#124; Mysterious Universe</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2010/ufos/ufo-photos/the-battle-of-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-3788</link>
		<dc:creator>Fighting the Phantom Menace at the Battle of Los Angeles &#124; Mysterious Universe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 05:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2010/ufos/ufo-photos/the-battle-of-paris/#comment-3788</guid>
		<description>[...] the night skies of Paris as part of the Nuit Blanche celebration in October 2009. However, as Forgetomori noted, the light installation by artist Michel de Broin titled La Maîtresse de la Tour Eiffel (The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the night skies of Paris as part of the Nuit Blanche celebration in October 2009. However, as Forgetomori noted, the light installation by artist Michel de Broin titled La Maîtresse de la Tour Eiffel (The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2010/ufos/ufo-photos/the-battle-of-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-3674</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2010/ufos/ufo-photos/the-battle-of-paris/#comment-3674</guid>
		<description>FOR GOD&#039;S SAKE THIS IS THE LAST TIME I&#039;LL MENTION IT.
FIX THE FORMATING ON YOUR PAGE PLEASE!! YOUR ADS CONSTANTLY
OVERRUN THE COMMENTS SECTION. OTHERWISE AWSOME SITE. CHEERS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOR GOD&#8217;S SAKE THIS IS THE LAST TIME I&#8217;LL MENTION IT.<br />
FIX THE FORMATING ON YOUR PAGE PLEASE!! YOUR ADS CONSTANTLY<br />
OVERRUN THE COMMENTS SECTION. OTHERWISE AWSOME SITE. CHEERS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Battle of Paris &#124; forgetomori -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2010/ufos/ufo-photos/the-battle-of-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-3667</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Battle of Paris &#124; forgetomori -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 01:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2010/ufos/ufo-photos/the-battle-of-paris/#comment-3667</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rick MG, gigi malih. gigi malih said: The Battle of Paris http://bit.ly/8FXwuA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rick MG, gigi malih. gigi malih said: The Battle of Paris <a href="http://bit.ly/8FXwuA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8FXwuA</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alanborky</title>
		<link>http://forgetomori.com/2010/ufos/ufo-photos/the-battle-of-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-3665</link>
		<dc:creator>alanborky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forgetomori.com/2010/ufos/ufo-photos/the-battle-of-paris/#comment-3665</guid>
		<description>Kentaro, I&#039;ve often wondered about the Los Angeles &quot;Battle&quot; picture.

What bugs me about it is why would the US authorities, after Pearl Harbour, permit its citizens to be shown evidence of America&#039;s potential vulnerability to invasion by air?

Okay, maybe that was the picture&#039;s point - look, see, nothing gets by us!  But the shape of it bugs me, too.  If the British authorities&#039;d handled this, rather than allow our public&#039;s imagination to run potentially rampant by being exposed to the idea of an unknown technology that&#039;d make people go, &quot;Bli&#039;me!  What the hell&#039;re the enemy throwing at us, now?&quot;, they&#039;d&#039;ve doctored the image to something more explicable, something less menacing.

But looking at the shape itself: yes, it could be a &#039;classic&#039; spinning top type flying saucer - a pretty compelling image, especially at a time when such shapes weren&#039;t yet part of the visual lexicon of the age - but that pointed top it has&#039;d also be there if it was, say, some kind of highly reflective balloon-like structure dangling from a cable below an out of sight plane.

What I&#039;m suggesting is, what if the whole thing was some kind of display deliberately put on with the purpose of manipulating public opinion?  For instance, at the time, California must&#039;ve had a higher than average number of Japanese descended citizenry, and if there was any kind of political resistance to the idea of interning them a stunt like this might&#039;ve been intended to reduce that resistance.

Then, again, maybe it was an authentic UFO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kentaro, I&#8217;ve often wondered about the Los Angeles &#8220;Battle&#8221; picture.</p>
<p>What bugs me about it is why would the US authorities, after Pearl Harbour, permit its citizens to be shown evidence of America&#8217;s potential vulnerability to invasion by air?</p>
<p>Okay, maybe that was the picture&#8217;s point &#8211; look, see, nothing gets by us!  But the shape of it bugs me, too.  If the British authorities&#8217;d handled this, rather than allow our public&#8217;s imagination to run potentially rampant by being exposed to the idea of an unknown technology that&#8217;d make people go, &#8220;Bli&#8217;me!  What the hell&#8217;re the enemy throwing at us, now?&#8221;, they&#8217;d've doctored the image to something more explicable, something less menacing.</p>
<p>But looking at the shape itself: yes, it could be a &#8216;classic&#8217; spinning top type flying saucer &#8211; a pretty compelling image, especially at a time when such shapes weren&#8217;t yet part of the visual lexicon of the age &#8211; but that pointed top it has&#8217;d also be there if it was, say, some kind of highly reflective balloon-like structure dangling from a cable below an out of sight plane.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m suggesting is, what if the whole thing was some kind of display deliberately put on with the purpose of manipulating public opinion?  For instance, at the time, California must&#8217;ve had a higher than average number of Japanese descended citizenry, and if there was any kind of political resistance to the idea of interning them a stunt like this might&#8217;ve been intended to reduce that resistance.</p>
<p>Then, again, maybe it was an authentic UFO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

